June 24, 2022

Medical Trend

Medical News and Medical Resources

Application of Vasoactive Drugs in Severe Heart Failure

Application of Vasoactive Drugs in Severe Heart Failure

Application of Vasoactive Drugs in Severe Heart Failure. Heart failure (referred to as heart failure) is the biggest challenge to cardiovascular disease in the 21st century. The prognosis of heart failure is poor, and the prognosis of severe heart failure is even worse. However, there is currently no clear definition of severe heart failure, which generally refers to acute heart failure, refractory heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and heart failure combined with damage to other organs (such as liver and kidney damage).

Data show that among Chinese residents ≥ 35 years of age, the prevalence of heart failure is 1.3%, which is approximately 13.7 million patients with heart failure. The prevalence of heart failure has increased by 44% compared with the survey results 15 years ago; patients with heart failure are hospitalized The mortality rate during the period was 4.1%, the emergency mortality rate of patients with acute heart failure was 9.6%, the hospital mortality rate for cardiogenic shock was as high as 27%-51%, and the 1-year mortality rate for patients with drug-maintained refractory heart failure reached 75%, almost No patient survived more than 2 years. Vasoactive drugs are a basic treatment for severe heart failure. On November 28, 2020, at the Critical Heart Disease Conference (CHDC), Professor Zhang Yao from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University made a wonderful sharing on the topic of “The Application Value of Vasoactive Drugs in Severe Heart Failure” .

Severe heart failure and vasoactive drugs

Professor Zhang Yao introduced that vasoactive drugs are mainly used to improve blood pressure, cardiac output and microcirculation by regulating vasomotor state, regulating vascular function and improving microcirculation blood perfusion, so as to achieve the purpose of treatment (anti-shock). Vasoactive drugs are divided into 4 categories according to whether there is a “positive inotropic effect”, cardiac vasoconstrictor, cardiac vasodilator, vasoconstrictor and vasodilator.

Vasoactive drugs mainly treat severe heart failure through three regulatory mechanisms. First, by acting on vascular receptors, mainly including adrenergic receptors, cholinergic receptors, angiotensin receptors, adenosine receptors and endothelin receptors; secondly, neuroregulation, norepinephrine (NE ) Is the main neurotransmitter of adrenergic nerves. Vasoactive drugs act by controlling the release of neurotransmitters from adrenergic nerves. Most vasoconstrictors release inositol triphosphate (IP3) to increase the concentration of calcium ions in the cytoplasm.

Most vasodilators inhibit smooth muscle contraction by increasing intracellular cAMP or cGMP and reducing intracellular calcium ion concentration. Finally, nitric oxide is regulated. NO is an important cardiovascular messenger substance, synthesized by endothelial cells. It can reduce the release of norepinephrine from nerve endings, activate guanylate cyclase, and promote the formation of cGMP, thereby reducing the level of calcium ions in the cytoplasm and inhibiting smooth muscle contraction.

Traditional vasoactive drugs

1. Vasodilators with no positive effect

Professor Zhang Yao first reviewed the non-positive vasodilators-sodium nitroprusside, nitrate esters and urapidil.

Both sodium nitroprusside and nitrate esters reduce intracellular calcium concentration through the NO-sCG-cGMP pathway, which leads to vascular smooth muscle relaxation, but the mechanism of sodium nitroprusside release of NO is different from that of nitrate esters.

Nitrate drugs need to be metabolized in smooth muscle cells by mitochondrial acetaldehyde dehydrogenase and cytochrome P450 enzymes in the endoplasmic reticulum before they can release NO; sodium nitroprusside can be directly degraded into nitrite after entering the blood. , NO can be produced in the blood without entering into smooth muscle cell metabolism. Based on the above two different sources of NO, the targets of the two drugs are different. The target of sodium nitroprusside is non-selective, large arteries, arterioles, veins, and capillaries can all be expanded; sodium nitroprusside can expand arterioles and easily cause coronary “theft”. However, nitrates have higher selectivity. NO can be released only in smooth muscles rich in acetaldehyde dehydrogenase such as veins. They have a poor effect in large arteries and have a certain effect in coronary arteries and large blood vessels, but in small Basically no NO is released in the arteries.

And Urapidil has a dual mechanism of action of the periphery and the center. Its peripheral function is mainly to block the postsynaptic membrane α1 receptor, which reduces the total peripheral vascular resistance and expands blood vessels; at the same time, it also has a mild α2 blocking the vasoconstrictor effect of catecholamines; the central action is mainly through the activation of serotonin 1A receptors , Reduce the sympathetic feedback regulation of the medulla oblongata cardiovascular center. Scope of application: It can be used for patients with hypertension combined with acute heart failure and aortic dissection combined with acute heart failure (recommended level: IIa class B).

2. Multi-effect vasodilator-gene recombinant brain natriuretic peptide (rhBNP)

Professor Zhang Yao introduced that most patients with heart failure are relatively/absolutely insufficient in BNP. Although BNP secretion is up-regulated in the decompensated phase of heart failure, there is still a serious absolute or relative deficiency compared with the body’s excessive stress response, and it is difficult to compensate for the rapidly deteriorating hemodynamic state. However, with the deepening of BNP research, people began to increase the concentration of BNP and exert its physiological activity to treat heart failure. Recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide (rhBNP) and endogenous brain natriuretic peptide have the same amino acid sequence, spatial structure and biological activity, so they have the same mechanism of action.

rhBNP is classified as a vasodilator (it can dilate veins, arteries, and coronary arteries, reduce anterior and afterload, and increase cardiac output), but it is not a pure vasodilator and has a variety of biological activities. The mode of administration is slow intravenous injection with a loading dose of 1.5-2µg/kg, followed by continuous intravenous infusion of 0.01µg/kg/min; it can also be infused directly without a loading dose (IIb, B).

“Compared with vasodilators, inpatients with acute decompensated heart failure, on the basis of standard anti-heart failure treatment, the addition of rhBNP is better than nitroglycerin or control in improving patient hemodynamic indicators and patient self-evaluated clinical symptoms. Anti-heart failure drugs.” Professor Zhang Yao said.

The famous VMAC trial published on JAMA in 2002 is a prospective multi-center randomized double-blind trial, 55 clinical research units, 489 patients with heart failure, aged >65 years old, randomly divided into three groups: one group is based on In the treatment, brain natriuretic peptide (2μg/kg intravenous bolus, 0.01μg/kg/min intravenous drip) was added, the other group was treated with nitroglycerin, the third group was the control group, and only the basic treatment was used. The results of the study showed that, compared with nitroglycerin, brain natriuretic peptide significantly reduced pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure, suggesting that brain natriuretic peptide is better than nitroglycerin in improving left ventricular load in patients with heart failure.


3. Vasoactive drugs with positive inotropic effect

Positive inotropic drugs mainly include β-adrenergic agonists (dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine and norepinephrine, etc.), phosphodiesterase III inhibitors (milrinone, enoximone, etc.) , Calcium ion sensitizer (levosimendan, etc.) and digitalis in four categories.

Professor Zhang Yao emphasized that inotropic drugs still occupy an irreplaceable position in the field of HF treatment, especially in improving symptoms of hypotension and hypoperfusion AHF (including cardiogenic shock (CS)) and advanced HF (AdvHF) patients Significantly. However, inotropic drugs are also a “double-edged sword”, and the risk of adverse events caused by inotropic drugs should not be ignored. Therefore, during the application of inotropic drugs, blood pressure, heart rate, heart rhythm, hemodynamics, and changes in clinical status should be closely monitored, and should be stopped as soon as possible after the condition is stable.


It is worth noting that a number of studies have found that some positive inotropic drugs can not bring survival benefits to HF patients, but increase the short-term and long-term mortality risk of HF, which is closely related to the unreasonable use of drugs. Therefore, clinicians should pay special attention to the indications of inotropic drugs. The current indications include, suitable for patients with hypotension (systolic pressure <90mmHg) and/or hypoperfusion of tissues and organs (IIb, C). Short-term intravenous use of inotropic drugs can increase cardiac output, raise blood pressure, relieve tissue hypoperfusion, and maintain important organ functions.

Then, Professor Zhang Yao introduced several clinical trials of inotropic drugs. Among them, the ROSE AHF study found that patients with HFrEF with renal insufficiency are more responsive to dopamine. ROSE AHF included AHF patients with renal insufficiency (n = 360; any EF value). The primary endpoints were cumulative urine output and changes in serum cystatin-C within 72 hours.

In HFrEF, the urine output of the dopamine treatment group was higher than that of the placebo, while in HFpEF, the urine output of the treatment group was lower; whether it was HFrEF or HFpEF, Nesiritide did not significantly improve urine output; two drugs All have no significant improvement effect on serum cystatin-C.


4. Combined application of drugs with vasodilator effect

Professor Zhang Yao pointed out that whether to combine drugs with vasodilator effects is the focus of clinical research. According to the data of three AHF registration studies, there are 988 cardiogenic shock patients with ALARMHF, EFICA and AHEAD. Comparison of vasopressors (epinephrine, norepinephrine and dopamine) alone (407 cases) and combined application has Inotropic vasodilators (dobutamine, levosimendan and phosphodiesterase inhibitors) (581 cases), the impact of these two treatment strategies on short-term mortality in patients with severe cardiogenic shock , The primary endpoint is 30-day mortality. The results showed that the mortality rate of the single drug group was 72%, and the mortality rate of the combined drug group was 60%, (HR: 0.66 [0.55-0.80]. Therefore, the combined drug can effectively reduce the mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock.

New vasoactive drugs

Many patients with heart failure (HFrEF) with reduced ejection fraction may continue to get worse even if they receive the best medical treatment. The soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) pathway of nitric oxide (NO) plays an important role in regulating NO and producing cGMP. “This new mechanism may be used in the treatment of heart failure. The sGC agonist Vericiguat is one of the representatives.” Professor Zhang Yao said.

According to the VICTORIA study announced at the ACC meeting this year, Vericiguat can inhibit vasoconstriction while improving kidney function. VICTORIA is a multi-international center, parallel, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled study conducted in more than 600 centers in 42 countries and regions including Europe, Japan, China and the United States. A total of 5,050 HFrEF patients were enrolled, and the patients were randomly divided into two groups according to a 1:1 ratio. Under the background of combined standard treatment of heart failure, they were given Vericiguat and placebo treatments. To evaluate whether Vericiguat can reduce the incidence of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients with HFrEF in the context of standard treatment.

The results showed that compared with placebo, Vericiguat can significantly reduce the risk of the composite endpoint (primary endpoint) of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization by 10% (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98, P = 0.019), and the primary endpoint event is absolute ( ARR) decreased by 4.2/100 person-years. Compared with placebo, Vericiguat significantly reduced the incidence of the composite endpoint of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization in the secondary endpoint by 10% (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98, P = 0.021); it also reduced heart failure Hospitalization risk was 10% (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81–1.00, P = 0.048).

Application of Vasoactive Drugs in Severe Heart Failure

In recent years, certain achievements have been made in the research and development of vasoactive drugs for severe heart failure. Professor Zhang Yao believes that vasoactive drugs play an important role in severe heart failure, but the application of vasoactive drugs must be combined with hemodynamic characteristics and closely monitored. According to the pharmacological mechanism of different vasoactive drugs, reasonable single or combined application.



Disclaimer of medicaltrend.org