- Will CAR-NK Cancer Therapy Surpass High-Cost CAR-T Immunotherapy?
- What is the role of Platelet Dynamics in Cancer Progression?
- Biomarkers can detect rapid aging of organs and disease risks
- Avoiding “Off-Target” Effects: Researchers Enhance the Safety of Future mRNA Therapies
- Japan: Sales Halted for ‘Cannabis Gummies’ as Health Issues Mount
- Evaluation of the carcinogenicity of organic fluorine compounds raised by WHO subsidiary
Is radiotherapy necessary for low-risk thyroid cancer?
- FDA Investigates T-Cell Malignancy Risk in CAR-T Cell Therapy
- WHO Requests More Information from China on Pediatric Clustered Pneumonia
- First Chinese PD-1 Cancer Drug 30 Times More Expensive in U.S. than in China
- Cardiovascular Diseases Linked to COVID-19 Infections
- What is the difference between dopamine and dobutamine?
- How long can the patient live after heart stent surgery?
NEJM: Is radiotherapy necessary for low-risk thyroid cancer? This study has the potential to rewrite the guidelines
Thyroid cancer is the most common neck tumor, and the detection rate has been increasing in recent years . Fortunately, the overall prognosis of thyroid cancer is good, the overall recurrence rate after treatment is less than 5%, and the 5-year survival rate is more than 90% .
To reduce the risk of tumor recurrence, after thyroidectomy, radionuclides (iodine-131) are also usually used to destroy residual thyroid tissue and remove possible residual thyroid cancer cells, but this radiation therapy can take some time in the patient’s life. Influence (such as fertility, etc.) and there are certain side effects (such as parotid gland damage) .
Currently, there is a consensus that radioactive iodine therapy is not required for patients with single-focal microcarcinoma (diameter ≤10 mm), but the need for radioactive iodine therapy in other low-risk thyroid cancer patients remains controversial .
Recently, the team of Professor Sophie. Leboulleux from the University of Paris-Saclay published the results of a large-scale randomized controlled clinical trial (ESTIMABL2, NCT01837745) in the New England Journal of Medicine . Patients, after 3 years of treatment, those who did not receive iodine radiation had no worse prognosis than those who received iodine radiation (1.1 GBq) .
The results of this multi-center clinical trial will further optimize the indication selection for radioactive iodine therapy after thyroid cancer surgery, if it is consistent with the results of another similar multi-center clinical trial (completed, data analysis ongoing) If so, it will likely change the guidelines and save many patients with low-risk thyroid cancer from radiation therapy .
The inclusion criteria for this clinical study, called ESTIMABL2, were: adult patients with pathologically proven differentiated thyroid cancer (papillary, follicular, or eosinophilic thyroid cancer) , multifocal pT1a tumors (diameter of each lesion) ≤ 1 cm and the sum of the longest tumor diameters ≤ 2 cm) or pT1b tumors (1 cm < tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm) , no regional lymph node involvement or regional lymph node metastases cannot be assessed due to no neck dissection, no thyroid external invasion. In addition, all patients underwent neck ultrasonography postoperatively, and no abnormalities were found.
The Leboulleux team randomly divided the enrolled patients into a radiotherapy group (RT group, 1.1 GBq of iodine radiotherapy after intramuscular injection of 2 injections of recombinant human thyrotropin) and a non-radiotherapy group (no-RT group, no postoperative period). received iodine radiation therapy) and were followed up for 3 years.
The non-inferiority design of this study was to assess whether the no-RT group had a functional event (full-body scan or SPECT showing foci of extrathyroid radioactive iodine uptake, which was only for the RT group) , structural event (neck ultrasound ) Suspicious mass found and biopsy cytology) and biochemical events (abnormal thyroglobulin or thyroglobulin antibody levels) were not inferior to RT in the event-free rate (noninferiority definition: no functional, structural, biochemical events). of patients with a between-group difference of less than 5 percentage points).
Research flow chart
Finally, a total of 776 patients from 35 French centers were included in the cohort. The mean age of the patients was 52 years, 83% were female, and the histological examination was dominated by papilloma (95.9%).
Among the 730 patients evaluable with complete follow-up data, the non-function, structural, and biological event rates were 95.6% in the no-RT group and 95.9% in the RT group, with a difference of 0.3 percentage points between the two groups (90% bilateral ). %CI, −2.7-2.2) , meeting the non-inferiority margin .
Specifically, outcome events occurred in 16 of 367 patients in the no-RT group (4.4%) and in 15 of 363 patients in the RT group (4.1%) . These events included functional or structural abnormalities in 8 patients and biochemical abnormalities in 23 patients (see Figure 3). At the same time, the two groups of patients had the same good response rate at 10 months and 3 years of follow-up (see Figure 4).
Functional, structural and biochemical events in the no-RT group and the RT group
The rate of good response to treatment in the two groups at 10 months and 3 years of follow-up
During the 3-year follow-up period, a total of 14 patients (4 in the no-RT group and 10 in the RT group) received additional treatment (surgery, radioactive iodine therapy, or both) and others with abnormal events The patient received no additional treatment during follow-up. In addition, 30 patients experienced adverse events, none of which were determined to be treatment-related upon investigation.
Next, the researchers assessed the quality of life of the two groups of patients. Corresponding scale results showed that patients in the no-RT group and the RT group had similar scores in terms of overall quality of life, anxiety, distress, and fear of relapse .
The incidence of salivary or lacrimal gland dysfunction was similar between the two groups at all time points, except that the incidence of lacrimal gland dysfunction was higher in the RT group at 2 months after assignment.
The researchers also searched for predictors of functional, structural and biochemical events through univariate analysis.
The analysis found that patients with tumor diameters less than 14 mm and patients with postoperative serum thyroglobulin levels higher than the cut-off value had functional, structural and biochemical events. The risk of the event is higher .
Univariate analysis to find predictors of functional, structural, and biochemical events
Finally, to understand whether there are differences in tumor molecular pathology between patients with an outcome event (case group) and patients without an outcome event (control group), the researchers performed molecular pathology testing on 90 tumor samples and found that 50 tumor samples had BRAF mutation, 14 tumor samples had RAS mutations, and 6 tumor samples had oncogenic fusions.
There was no significant difference in the frequency of BRAF gene mutation between the case group (61.5%) and the control group (53.1%), and no difference between the groups was found for other mutations .
It is worth noting that in previous studies involving patients with low-risk thyroid cancer, most tumor recurrence occurred in the first 5 years of follow-up, while this study only followed patients for 3 years, and it would be more difficult if longer follow-up data were available. persuasive.
However, the flaws do not hide the beauty. In this multicenter randomized controlled trial involving patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer, the researchers demonstrated for the first time that patients who did not receive radioactive iodine after thyroidectomy had a non-inferior prognosis compared to those who received radioactive iodine Opportunity to get rid of the troubles and toxic side effects caused by radioactive iodine therapy .
1. Kim J, Gosnell JE, Roman SA: Geographic influences in the global rise of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2020, 16(1):17-29.
2. Megwalu UC, Moon PK: Thyroid Cancer Incidence and Mortality Trends in the United States: 2000-2018. Thyroid 2022.
3. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, Pacini F, Randolph GW, Sawka AM, Schlumberger M et al: 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer : The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016, 26(1):1-133.
4. Verburg FA, Flux G, Giovanella L, van Nostrand D, Muylle K, Luster M: Differentiated thyroid cancer patients potentially benefitting from postoperative Mol I-131 therapy: a review of the literature of the past decade. Eur J Nucl Med Imaging 2020, 47(1):78-83.
5. Leboulleux S, Bournaud C, Chougnet CN, Zerdoud S, Al Ghuzlan A, Catargi B, Do Cao C, Kelly A, Barge ML, Lacroix L et al: Thyroidectomy without Radioiodine in Patients with Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer. N Engl J Med 2022, 386(10):923-932.
6. Mallick U, Harmer C, Hackshaw A, Moss L, Io NTMG: Iodine or Not (IoN) for low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: the next UK National Cancer Research Network randomised trial following HiLo. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2012, 24(3):159-161.
Is radiotherapy necessary for low-risk thyroid cancer?
(source:internet, reference only)
Important Note: The information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as medical advice.