- Will CAR-NK Cancer Therapy Surpass High-Cost CAR-T Immunotherapy?
- What is the role of Platelet Dynamics in Cancer Progression?
- Biomarkers can detect rapid aging of organs and disease risks
- Avoiding “Off-Target” Effects: Researchers Enhance the Safety of Future mRNA Therapies
- Japan: Sales Halted for ‘Cannabis Gummies’ as Health Issues Mount
- Evaluation of the carcinogenicity of organic fluorine compounds raised by WHO subsidiary
CAR-NK therapy for cancer immunotherapy
- FDA Investigates T-Cell Malignancy Risk in CAR-T Cell Therapy
- WHO Requests More Information from China on Pediatric Clustered Pneumonia
- First Chinese PD-1 Cancer Drug 30 Times More Expensive in U.S. than in China
- Cardiovascular Diseases Linked to COVID-19 Infections
- What is the difference between dopamine and dobutamine?
- How long can the patient live after heart stent surgery?
CAR-NK therapy for cancer immunotherapy.
So far, the clinical application of CAR T cells is mainly limited to CD19-expressing B-cell malignancies; however, ongoing research is testing its application in other hematological malignancies, such as Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia.
The US Food and Drug Administration has approved autologous CD19 CAR T cell products for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and certain types of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas.
However, CAR T cells have several limitations:
(I) It is logically troublesome to generate autologous products from patients;
(ii) The production of CAR T cells takes several weeks-which is impractical for patients with aggressive diseases;
(iii) It may not be feasible to generate clinically relevant doses of CAR T cells from a large number of pretreated lymphopenia patients. Another method is to use T cells previously collected from allogeneic sources; however, even with HLA matching, T cells can cause severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).
Contrary to the popularity of CAR T cells, although NK cells have multiple advantages, the production and clinical application of CAR natural killer (NK) cells have been lagging behind due to various reasons. Here, we describe these obstacles and discuss strategies to overcome them.
Therapeutic advantages of CAR-NK cells
Among cytolytic lymphocytes, NK cells represent the most effective anti-tumor effector of each cell, have a unique mechanism of action (Figure 1), and provide an attractive cell source for cancer immunotherapy.
Inhibitory NK receptors protect healthy cells by recognizing the “self” HLA molecules on their surface to protect healthy cells from NK-mediated lysis.
On the other hand, tumor or virus-infected cells usually down-regulate or lose their HLA molecules as an escape mechanism against T cells. Due to the loss of the inhibitory signal, the loss of HLA class I expression makes them susceptible to lysis by NK cells.
In fact, the clinical significance of NK cell allogeneic reaction has been confirmed in a number of studies in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), in which patients receiving transplants containing allogeneic NK cells have a significantly reduced risk of recurrence , The survival rate is improved.
The adoptive transfer of alloreactive NK cells as an independent therapy (independent of HSCT) has also shown encouraging results in various malignant tumors.
In contrast, several studies of autologous NK cell adoptive therapy have shown quite disappointing results.
Figure 1. The mechanism of natural killer cell cytotoxicity.
Therefore, for a variety of reasons, NK cells provide an attractive alternative to T cells for CAR engineering:
(i) Allogeneic NK cells should not cause GVHD, as predicted by observations in mouse models, as well as haploid and umbilical cord blood (CB)-derived NK cell transfusions in clinical studies of hematology or solid malignant tumors. Note the effect;
(ii) Mature NK cells have a relatively limited lifespan, allowing effective anti-tumor activity while reducing the possibility of long-term adverse events;
(iii) CAR-NK cells retain their inherent ability to recognize and target tumor cells through their natural receptors; therefore, compared with CAR T cells, even if they down-regulate CAR target antigens, tumor cells are theoretically less likely to escape NK Immune surveillance.
By selecting donors based on donor-acceptor KIR ligand mismatch or donor haplotype B KIR gene content, this unique characteristic of NK cells can be further utilized to produce NK-CAR, because both have been proven to be correct Settings for allogeneic HSCT. Therefore, compared with the current lack of CAR T cell products in many centers, allogeneic NK cells provide the potential for ready-made cell products for immunotherapy and can be easily used immediately for clinical use.
Sources of NK cells
NK cell source for adoptive immunotherapy
Functional NK cells can be produced from a variety of sources. Although autologous NK cells can be used for adoptive therapy, their efficacy on autologous cancer cells is quite limited.
We have shown that CAR engineering may not be easy to overcome this.
Sources of allogeneic NK cells include peripheral blood (PB), bone marrow (BM), human embryonic stem cells (hESC), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), umbilical cord CB or ready-made NK cell lines.
Obtaining NK cells from PB through apheresis or harvesting from BM is both troublesome and related to the potential risks of healthy donors. Deriving NK cells from hESC or iPSC is a complex process, and the field is still evolving.
In contrast, the NK cell line provides an easily accessible and homogeneous cell source for generating a large number of CAR-transduced NK cells, such as NK-92, KHYG-1, NKL, NKG and YT.
NK-92 is a highly cytotoxic NK cell line derived from NK lymphoma patients. It is characterized by CD56bright CD16neg/lowNKG2A positive and KIR negative (except KIR2DL4) .
Phase I clinical studies have proved the safety of NK-92 cell infusion in cancer patients, even up to a dose of 10 10 cells/m² (98-100).
Based on these data, people are very interested in CAR-engineered NK-92 cells for clinical use (Table 1).
However, NK-92 cells have many disadvantages that need to be considered. First of all, NK-92 cells are derived from NK lymphoma patients, so it is possible to implant the tumor after infusion.
In addition, they are EBV positive and carry a variety of cytogenetic abnormalities similar to NK lymphoma.
Therefore, as a safety measure, NK-92 cells must be irradiated before infusion into the patient to prevent permanent implantation.
This will have a negative impact on their proliferation and persistence in vivo. These two factors are critical to the success of cell therapy in the study of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and CAR-T cells.
In fact, in a study of NK-92 cells modified with ErbB2/HER2-CAR, although radiation has no effect on the in vitro cytotoxicity of CAR-transduced NK92 cells, it has a negative effect on its replication and persistence in vivo.
Affected, the cells are no longer detectable within 7 days after adoptive infusion.
It is worth noting that NK-92 cells are CD16 (FCRIIIγ) negative and cannot mediate antibody-dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC) unless they are genetically modified to express CD16.
Table 1. Clinical trials of NK CAR.
On the other hand, umbilical cord blood is a readily available source of allogeneic NK cells, which has obvious advantages over related or unrelated adult donors, including speed of acquisition and tolerable HLA mismatch, which expands the donor Library. The proportion of NK cells in CB (~15–20%) is similar to that of PB (~10-15%).
However, until recently, the small amount of blood in the CB unit made it challenging to obtain a sufficient number of NK cells for clinical use.
In addition, resting CB NK cells are immature in phenotype and function. The expression of inhibitory receptor NKG2A is higher, while the expression of activating and mature receptors such as NKp46, NKG2C, DNAM-1 and CD57 is lower.
There is a phase I clinical report that the use of GMP-grade K562-based artificial antigen presenting cells (aAPC) to express membrane-bound IL-21 and 4-1BB ligand can reliably produce clinically relevant doses of GMP-grade NK cells from the CB unit for adoptive immunity therapy.
After activation and expansion in vitro, CB-derived NK cells showed a complete array of activation and inhibitory receptors, and strongly expressed ectodermal protein (Eomes) and T-bet, which are two factors necessary for the maturation of NK cells.
It also exerts similar cytotoxicity to PB-NK cells. In summary, these studies support the use of NK cells as a source of cancer cell therapy.
Components of CAR
The CAR construct consists of three parts: the extracellular antigen recognition part, the transmembrane domain and the intracellular signal transduction domain.
In NK cells, CD3ζ homodimer transmits signals from FcγRIII (CD16), thereby contributing to ADCC. Although CD28 is one of the most commonly used costimulatory domains in CAR T cells, except in certain cell lines, its role in NK cell function remains unclear.
A study showed that NK-92 cells transduced with CD19-CAR expressing CD28-CD3ζ have better cytotoxicity to CD19-positive targets than cells expressing CD137-CD3ζ containing CAR.
DNAX activating protein 12 (DAP12) is a transmembrane protein involved in the signal transduction of a variety of NK cell activation receptors, including NKG2C, NKp44 and activated KIR.
Another study tested whether a prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) CAR that uses DAP12 as an intracellular signal domain compared with a CAR containing CD3ζ can provide sufficient signals to induce NK cell activation.
The author used PSCA-DAP12 CAR to transduce YTS-NK cells and primary NK cells, and noticed that it has better cytotoxicity than NK cells expressing CD3ζ-based CAR.
More research is needed to define the best costimulatory molecules and signaling domains for NK cells.
The incorporation of foreign genes into cells requires the use of vectors, which can be based on viral or non-viral systems. The most commonly used tools for CAR gene delivery include genetically engineered retroviruses [lentivirus and γ-retroviral vectors].
The advantage of lentiviruses is that they can infect dividing and non-dividing cells, while retroviruses only infect dividing cells. Therefore, lentiviral vectors can be used to transduce more types of cells, including resting stem cells.
In addition, compared with retroviral vectors, lentiviral vectors can accommodate larger transgenes. Although insertional mutagenesis is extremely rare, it is still a problem with viral vectors, although its possibility is affected by many factors, such as the specific type of vector used and the site of integration.
For example, in an early gene therapy trial using CD34+ hematopoietic cells to treat X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), 2 out of 10 treated children in one study developed acute leukemia, and 4 in another study One child developed acute leukemia.
However, subsequent SCID children’s genetically modified hematopoietic stem cell trials or CAR T cell adoptive immunotherapy studies did not find adverse events related to insertional mutagenesis.
However, in order to alleviate any theoretical concerns, various non-viral technologies have also been tested, such as the transposon/transposase system or mRNA transfection.
The efficiency of transduction using these techniques varies from study to study and depends on many factors, including the source of the cell.
In general, the transduction efficiency of CAR T cells is about 50%, but it can reach 90% or higher.
Existing challenges and countermeasures
Although NK cells have many advantages, there are still some obstacles to successfully generating CAR NK cells for clinical use.
Until recently, genetic engineering of NK cells proved to be challenging even using viral methods, with reports that the transduction efficiency of primary CB or PB-derived NK cells was less than 10%.
However, the recent optimization of viral transduction and electroporation protocols has rekindled the enthusiasm for genetic engineering of NK cells.
Although viral methods seem to be basically ineffective in inducing CAR expression in freshly isolated PB NK cells, when NK cells from PB (12-73%) or CB are activated and expanded (median 69%), Significantly better transduction efficiency can be achieved.
It was 43-93% in one study and 80% in another study (range 67-96%). Compared with studies on primary NK cells, NK92 cells are easier to transduce by mRNA electroporation, with an average efficiency of 25% to 50%.
However, because mRNA transcripts are not integrated into the genome, the expression of CAR molecules is usually short-lived and can only be detected within a few days, which may negatively affect the efficacy of engineered cells after adoptive transfer.
Another problem with the use of allogeneic NK cells is the possibility of injecting contaminating T or B cells into the expanded NK cell product, which theoretically can lead to GVHD or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, respectively.
Since a certain degree of HLA mismatch after CB transplantation is well tolerated, compared with PB, CB-derived CAR-NK cells may have a lower risk of clinically significant GVHD.
In addition, apart from a study that reported GVHD after adoptive transfer of IL-15/4-1BBL-activated NK cells activated by donor-derived IL-15/4-1BBL in HLA-matched, T-cell depleted PB HSCT recipients, hundreds of haploidentical clinical studies CB NK cell transfusion and CB NK cell transfusion in patients with hematological and solid malignancies have not reported a higher risk of GVHD.
In contrast, experimental evidence obtained in mice shows that NK cells reduce the risk of GVHD through a variety of mechanisms, including depletion of host antigen-presenting cells and activated alloreactive T cells.
Another potential limitation of NK cells for immunotherapy is that, compared with T cells, they are highly sensitive to the freezing and thawing process and lose activity after thawing.
Many groups are exploring strategies for optimal cryopreservation of NK cells, and have shown that the activity of frozen NK cells can be restored by incubating with cytokines such as IL-2 overnight.
Another characteristic of NKs is that they do not persist after adoptive transfer without cytokine support.
Although the shorter lifespan of NK cells may be beneficial, allowing anti-tumor activity while reducing the likelihood of long-term adverse events, such as long-term cytopenias caused by targeted/non-tumor toxicity to normal tissues, it may also limit them The effect of.
In order to survive and proliferate in the body, NK cells need continuous cytokine support, otherwise they can only be detected in the circulation for 1-2 weeks.
The two most commonly used cytokines that support the persistence of adoptively transferred NK cells are IL-2 and IL-15.
The infusion of IL-2 has serious side effects, including fever, chills, myalgia, and capillary leak syndrome, and can promote the expansion of regulatory T cells (Treg) that inhibit NK cells.
On the other hand, IL-15 does not support Treg expansion, but when administered as an exogenous pill to patients with metastatic melanoma and kidney cancer, it can cause dose-dependent toxicity, including neutropenia. Another way
to administer cytokines exogenously is to treat patients with lymph-depleting chemotherapy such as cyclophosphamide and fludarabine before infusion of NK cells, which expands NK cells by depleting mature lymphocytes (depleting IL-15) The increase provides a favorable environment, leading to a significant increase in endogenous IL-15 levels.
Another new technology is to integrate IL-2 or IL-15 genes into CAR constructs to continuously provide cytokine support for CAR-transduced cells.
We recently demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of this method in a mouse model of Raji lymphoma.
Although compared with untransduced CB-NK, a single infusion of 1×10 7 CAR.19+ (without IL15) or CAR.19/IL15+CB-NK cells improved tumor control and prolonged survival , CAR.19/IL15+CB-NK CAR.CD19 construct can better control tumor expansion and prolong survival than CAR.CD19 construct lacking IL-15 gene, which emphasizes IL-15’s anti-tumor activity in vivo The key influence of the aspect.
We are in an exciting era in the field of cell therapy.
NK cells have broad prospects and provide potential for ready-made cell products for immunotherapy, which can be used for immediate clinical use at any time.
However, before NK cells can expand to a larger patient population, many scientific issues and regulatory obstacles must be resolved.
REVIEW article Front. Immunol., 15 February 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00283
Chimeric Antigen Receptor Expressing Natural Killer Cells for the Immunotherapy of Cancer
CAR-NK therapy for cancer immunotherapy.
(source:internet, reference only)
Important Note: The information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as medical advice.